Why is this controversial? If there is no historical evidence of what Jesus looked like...no one painted his portrait..., why is the only acceptable image of Jesus a white image? Should there be no image at all? Well, do away with all of them INCLUDING the ones that depict him as white! Hair like "lambs wool", feet Burnt brass... Come on!!!!!! Please, scholars have a dialogue about it! Study it, research it! The information is already out there. Research has already been done!

Who owns the image of Jesus anyway? Why is an image necessary? If it's not necessary, get rid of ALL of the images!!!!